Associate Professor of Medical Oncology /Department of Clinical Hematology & Medical Oncology Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education & Research, Chandigarh
Phosphate Disorders in Cancer Joyita Bharati, Raad B. Chowdhury, Chandan Krushna Das, Hassan Izzedine, Kenar D. Jhaveri Kidney360, 2026 Phosphate disorders are common in patients with cancer. Hypophosphatemia and hyperphosphatemia, both, can lead to significant morbidity, and their mechanisms are uniquely influenced by tumor biology, anti-cancer therapies, and cellular shifts. Malignancies that can influence phosphate include MM that can cause both hypo- and hyperphosphatemia. Tumor-induced osteomalacia can lead to hypophosphatemia as well. Drug-induced renal phosphate wasting is a contributor to hypophosphatemia often associated with platinum-based therapy and tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Conversely, hyperphosphatemia often results from tumor lysis syndrome and can manifest as symptomatic hypocalcemia and acute kidney injury. A step wise approach in determining the mechanism of hypophosphatemia and hyperphosphatemia is crucial to identify most appropriate treatment, especially with the expanding use of novel cancer therapies. This review summarizes the key mechanisms and management of phosphate disorders in oncology care in the current era.
177Lu-PSMA-617 Consolidation Therapy After Docetaxel in Patients with Synchronous High-Volume Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer: A Randomized, Phase 2 Trial Swayamjeet Satapathy, Chandan K. Das, Shikha Goyal, Ashwani Sood, Kannan Periasamy, Piyush Aggarwal, Komal Preet, Shrawan K. Singh, Ravimohan S. Mavuduru, Girdhar S. Bora, Aditya P. Sharma, Gaurav Prakash, Rajender Kumar, Harmandeep Singh, Bhagwant R. Mittal Journal of Nuclear Medicine, 2025 Visual Abstract 177Lu-prostate-specific membrane antigen-617 (177Lu-PSMA-617) has shown positive survival outcomes in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. However, there are limited data in the hormone-sensitive setting. Here, in the CONSOLIDATE trial (177Lu-PSMA-617 Consolidation Therapy After Docetaxel in Patients with Synchronous High-Volume Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer), we intended to evaluate the role of 177Lu-PSMA-617 as consolidation therapy for residual disease after chemohormonal treatment in patients with synchronous high-volume metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC). Methods: This was an investigator-initiated randomized, parallel-group, open-label phase 2 trial. Synchronous high-volume mHSPC patients treated with androgen-deprivation therapy plus docetaxel and having residual nonprogressive disease after docetaxel completion (defined as prostate-specific antigen [PSA] > 0.2 ng/mL with PSMA-positive disease on 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT) were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to the experimental arm (177Lu-PSMA-617, 7.4 GBq/cycle × 2, 6 wk apart with protocol-permitted standard of care) or control arm (protocol-permitted standard of care alone). The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients achieving a PSA level of 0.2 ng/mL or less at 6 mo from randomization. Secondary endpoints included objective radiographic response rate, radiographic progression-free survival (PFS), PSA PFS, and toxicities. Results: The trial was terminated early because of poor accrual after the coronavirus disease pandemic and a change in treatment guidelines for mHSPC. Thirty high-volume mHSPC patients were randomized between January 2021 and June 2024. The primary endpoint was achieved in 9 of 15 (60%; 95% CI, 35%–85%) patients in the experimental arm versus 2 of 15 (13%; 95% CI, 0%–30%) in the control arm (risk ratio, 4.5; 95% CI, 1.2–17.4; P = 0.008). The objective radiographic response rates were 8 of 15 (53%; 95% CI, 28%–78%) and 1 of 15 (7%; 95% CI, 0%–19%) in the experimental and control arms, respectively (P = 0.014). The estimated median radiographic PFS and PSA PFS were 18 mo (95% CI, 9–27 mo) and 15 mo (95% CI, 12–18 mo), respectively, in the experimental arm versus 9 mo (95% CI, 4–14 mo) and 9 mo (95% CI, 1–17 mo), respectively, in the control arm. No grade 3 or 4 toxicity was noted with the addition of 177Lu-PSMA-617 in the experimental arm. Conclusion: In synchronous high-volume mHSPC patients having residual disease after chemohormonal treatment, 177Lu-PSMA-617 consolidation therapy demonstrated promising efficacy and safety outcomes. Larger phase 3 trials are warranted to definitively establish its survival benefit.
177Lu-DOTATATE Plus Capecitabine Versus 177Lu-DOTATATE Alone in Patients with Advanced Grade 1/2 Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors (LuCAP): A Randomized, Phase 2 Trial Swayamjeet Satapathy, Piyush Aggarwal, Ashwani Sood, Kunal R. Chandekar, Chandan K. Das, Rajesh Gupta, Divya Khosla, Namrata Das, Rakesh Kapoor, Rajender Kumar, Harmandeep Singh, Jaya Shukla, Ajay Kumar, Bhagwant Rai Mittal Journal of Nuclear Medicine, 2025 177Lu-DOTATATE has emerged as a viable treatment strategy for advanced well-differentiated grade 1/2 gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs). Few retrospective studies have shown concomitant 177Lu-DOTATATE with radiosensitizing low-dose capecitabine to be effective in advanced NETs. However, this has not been validated in prospective randomized-controlled trials. Methods: In this investigator-initiated, parallel-group, open-label, phase 2 trial, patients with grade 1/2 GEP-NETs, having progressive somatostatin receptor-positive, locally advanced, or metastatic disease on 68Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT, were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to 177Lu-DOTATATE plus capecitabine (experimental arm) or 177Lu-DOTATATE only (control arm). 177Lu-DOTATATE was administered at approximately 7.4 GBq/cycle intravenously, for up to 4 cycles, at 8 wk intervals, whereas capecitabine was given at 1,250 mg/m2/d orally from day 0 to day 14 of each cycle of 177Lu-DOTATATE. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate. Secondary endpoints included the disease control rate, progression-free survival, overall survival, and adverse events. Results: Seventy-two patients (median age, 53 y; range, 18-79 y) were enrolled. The objective response rate was 33.3% (95% CI, 18.6-50.9%) in the experimental arm versus 30.6% (95% CI, 16.4-48.1%) in the control arm (P = 0.800). The disease control rate was 88.9% (95% CI, 73.9-96.9%) and 91.7% (95% CI, 77.5-98.2%) in the experimental and control arms, respectively (P = 1.000). The estimated median progression-free survival in the experimental arm was 29 mo (95% CI, 22-29 mo) versus 31 mo (95% CI, 29-32 mo) in the control arm (P = 0.401). The median overall survival was not reached in either arm (P = 0.876). Overall, adverse events of at least grade 3 were noted in 7 patients in the experimental arm versus 6 patients in the control arm (P = 0.759). Conclusion: Based on the results of this trial, the addition of low-dose capecitabine to 177Lu-DOTATATE in advanced grade 1/2 GEP-NETs did not lead to superior radiographic responses. Further studies are needed to evaluate its potential role in high-grade NETs.
Aflatoxin exposure is associated with an increased risk of gallbladder cancer Amit Yadav, Pankaj Gupta, Parikshaa Gupta, Amol N. Patil, Chandan K. Das, Harish Hooda, Deepa Thakur, Vishal Sharma, Anupam K. Singh, Thakur Deen Yadav, Lileswar Kaman, Jarnail Singh Thakur, Hari Kishan Sudini, Radhika Srinivasan, Usha Dutta International Journal of Cancer, 2025 Gall bladder cancer (GBC) is common among the socioeconomically deprived populations of certain geographical regions. Aflatoxin is a genotoxic hepatocarcinogen, which is recognized to have a role in the pathogenesis of hepatocellular carcinoma. However, the role of aflatoxin in the pathogenesis of GBC is largely unknown. We determined serum AFB1‐Lys albumin adduct (AAA) levels as a marker of aflatoxin exposure in the patients with GBC and compared to those without GBC. The relationship of AAA levels to cytogenetic (TP53mutation&HER2/neu amplification) and radiological characteristics of the tumor was assessed. We included GBC cases (n = 51) and non‐GBC controls (n = 100). Mean serum AAA levels were higher in the GBC group (n = 51) than those without GBC (n = 100) (26.1 ± 12.2 vs. 13.1 ± 11.9 ng/mL; p < .001). HER2/neu expression was associated with higher AAA levels compared to those with equivocal or negative expression (43.9 ± 3 vs. 28.6 ± 10 vs. 19.3 ± 7 ng/mL; p < .001). Older age (age >50 years) (odds ratio [OR] = 3.2 [CI: 1.3–8.2]; p = .013), positive Helicobacter pylori serology (OR = 5.1 [CI: 1.4–17.8]; p = .012), presence of GS (OR = 5 [CI: 1.5–16.9]; p = .009) and detectable AAA levels (OR = 6.8 [CI: 1.3–35.7]; p = .024) were independent risk factors for the presence of the GBC among all study subjects. Among patients harboring GS, older age (age >50 years) (OR = 4.5 [CI: 1.3–14.9]; p = .015), female gender (OR = 3.8 [CI: 1.2–12.5]; p = .027), presence of multiple GS (OR = 21.9 [CI: 4.8–100.4]; p < .001) and high serum AAA levels (OR = 5.3 [CI: 1.6–17.3]; p = .006) were independent risk factors for the presence of the GBC. Elderly age >50 years (OR = 2.6 [CI: 1.3–5.2]; p = .010) and frequent peanut consumption (OR = 2.3 [CI: 1.1–4.9]; p = .030) were independent risk factors for high serum AAA levels. The current study has implications for the prevention of GBC through the reduction of dietary aflatoxin exposure.
Darolutamide in Combination with Androgen-Deprivation Therapy in Patients with Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer from the Phase III ARANOTE Trial Fred Saad, Egils Vjaters, Neal Shore, David Olmos, Nianzeng Xing, Andrea Juliana Pereira de Santana Gomes, Augusto Cesar de Andrade Mota, Pamela Salman, Mindaugas Jievaltas, Albertas Ulys, Maris Jakubovskis, Evgeny Kopyltsov, Weiqing Han, Liina Nevalaita, Isabella Testa, Marie-Aude Le Berre, Iris Kuss, Kunhi Parambath Haresh, Vinod Ganju, Howard Gurney, Laurence Krieger, Vineet Kwatra, Sanjeev Sewak, Amanda Stevanovic, Andrew Weickhardt, Alan Azambuja, Flavio Mavignier Carcano, Marcio Valerio Costa, Felipe Cruz, Juliana de Menezes, Charles Andree Joseph de Padua, Adriano Augusto de Paula, Carlos Eugenio Santiago Escovar, Fabio Leite Couto Fernandez, Otavio Gampel, Andrea Juliana P. de Santana Gomes, Murilo Luz, Gisele Marinho dos Santos, Augusto Cesar de Andrade Mota, Lucas Nogueira, Daniel D'Almeida Preto, Alexandre Sant'Anna, Katsuki Aruma Tiscoski, Jonathan Giddens, Godfrey Jansz, Julian Kim, Paul Quellette, Fred Saad, George Vrabec, Alejandro Acevedo Gaete, Christian Caglevic Medina, Javier Dominguez Cruzat, Marcelo Garrido Salvo, Pedro Octavio Pastor Arroyo, Anibal Salazar Huerta, Pamela Salman Boghikian, Yasna Daniela Valenzuela Velasquez, Ariel Zwenger, Cheng Fu, Hongqian Guo, Weiqing Han, Haowen Jiang, Junhui Jiang, Shusuan Jiang, Lei Li, Tongzu Liu, Zhenhua Liu, Lulin Ma, Jun Qi, Mingxing Qiu, Guowei Shi, Ye Tian, Ben Wan, Chun-Xi Wang, Dongwen Wang, Shaogang Wang, Xiaolin Wang, Shaozhong Wei, Jitao Wu, Jun Xiao, Keji Xie, Liping Xie, Nianzeng Xing, Boxin Xue, Zejun Yan, Yong Yang, Zhixian Yu, Dahong Zhang, Song Zheng, Fangjian Zhou, Suresh Advani, Pawan Agarwal, Niraj Bhatt, Dubashi Biswajit, Ghanashyam Biswas, Shailesh A. Bondarde, Chandan Das, SarojKumar Das Majumdar, Sujoy Gupta, Kunhi Parambath Haresh, Francis James, Pamela Jeyaraj, Amit Joshi, Suman Kalyan, Bhalchandra Kashyapi, Ashish Kaushal, Raghunath Krishnappa, Ravimohan Mavuduru, Rajanish Nagarkar, Harsha Panchal, Gourav Parkash, Ashwin Philips, Ginil Kumar Pooleri, Vikram Prabha, Krishna Kumar Rathnam, Naveen Ravel, Sudhir Rawal, Boya Rakesh Reddy, Manasi Shah, Praveena Voonna, Andrejs Aleksandrovs, Maris Jakubovskis, Alvis Laukmanis, Vilnis Lietuvietis, Mareks Vejins, Egils Vjaters, Mindaugas Jievaltas, Albertas Ulys, Raimundas Venckus, Arunas Zelvys, Kevin Bax, Peter Gilling, Michael Holmes, Alvin Tan, Carlos Manuel Morante Deza, Alberto Juan Pazos Franco, Jorge Fernando Salas Sanchez, Alejandro Figueroa Torrejon, Timur Andabekov, Vagif Atduev, Yana Chapko, Natalya Fadeeva, Alexander Filippov, Rustem Gafanov, Oleg Gladkov, Boris Kasparov, Denis Kholtobin, Evgeny Kopyltsov, Alexander Lykov, Marina Nechaeva, Alexey Plekhanov, Sufia Safina, Andrey Semenov, Mikhail Shkolnik, Pavel Skopin, Roman Smirnov, Ekaterina Solovyeva, Alexander Sultanbaev, Mikhail Zavyalov, Alexandr Zyryanov, Khabane Chabane, Corlia Coetzee, Conrad Jacobs, Thamsanqa Madlala, Jorn Malan, Sophie Mathijs, Carlos Llorente Abarca, Daniel Ernesto Castellano Gauna, Jose Luis Alvarez-Ossorio Fernandez, Enrique Gallardo Diaz, Pablo Borrega Garcia, Bernardo Herrera Imbroda, Rafael Antonio Medina Lopez, Josep Maria Gaya Sopena, Hsiao-Jen Chung, Shu-Pin Huang, Yuh-Shya Tsai, Pai-Fu Wang, Shian-Shiang Wang, Igor Bondarenko, Yurii Golovko, Petro Ivashchenko, Viktor Paramonov Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2024 PURPOSE For patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC), delaying progression to castration-resistant disease is important not only for overall survival (OS) but also for patients' quality of life. Darolutamide plus androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) with docetaxel improved OS versus ADT and docetaxel in patients with mHSPC. The ARANOTE trial evaluated darolutamide and ADT without chemotherapy in patients with mHSPC. METHODS In this global phase III trial, patients were randomly assigned 2:1 to receive darolutamide 600 mg twice daily or placebo, with concomitant ADT. The primary end point was radiological progression-free survival (rPFS). RESULTS From March 2021 to August 2022, 669 patients were randomly assigned (darolutamide n = 446; placebo n = 223). At the primary cutoff date (June 7, 2024), darolutamide plus ADT significantly improved rPFS, reducing the risk of radiological progression or death by 46% versus placebo plus ADT (hazard ratio [HR], 0.54 [95% CI, 0.41 to 0.71]; P < .0001), with consistent benefits across subgroups, including high- and low-volume disease. OS results were suggestive of benefit with darolutamide versus placebo (HR, 0.81 [95% CI, 0.59 to 1.12]), and clinical benefits were seen across all other secondary end points, including delayed time to metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (HR, 0.40 [95% CI, 0.32 to 0.51]) and time to pain progression (HR, 0.72 [95% CI, 0.54 to 0.96]). Adverse events were similar in the two groups. Notably, the incidence of fatigue was lower in patients receiving darolutamide (5.6%) versus those receiving placebo (8.1%), and fewer patients receiving darolutamide (6.1%) versus placebo (9.0%) discontinued treatment because of adverse events. CONCLUSION These results confirm the efficacy and tolerability of darolutamide plus ADT in patients with mHSPC, demonstrating clinically and statistically significant improvement in rPFS and a favorable safety profile consistent with prior phase III darolutamide trials.
Primary renal leiomyosarcoma in adult patients: a systematic review and individual patient data analysis Kannan Periasamy, Treshita Dey, Shikha Goyal, Renu Madan, Santosh Kumar, Sudheer Kumar Devana, Thiraviyam Elumalai, Prashanth Giridhar, Sushmita Ghoshal, Rakesh Kapoor, Chandan K. Das African Journal of Urology, 2024 Purpose The optimal management of primary renal leiomyosarcomas is unknown owing to its rarity and minimal available information about their primary, adjuvant treatment and clinical outcomes. This study systematically reviews treatment evidence and effects in terms of survival for leiomyosarcomas arising primarily from kidney, renal pelvis and renal vessels. Method PubMed and Embase databases were searched from inception to March 2023, with manual searches of reference lists. Two investigators independently reviewed the studies reporting management and survival outcomes of renal leiomyosarcomas. Results A total of 85 publications met inclusion criteria, reporting on 188 cases. The median age was 55.5 years, predominantly female [52.7%]. Pain was the most common presenting symptom [41.5%], and most tumors were high grade [45.8%]. Complete surgical resection with negative margins forms definitive treatment. The median disease-free survival and overall survival (OS) for all reviewed patients were 24 months [95%CI 4.1–43.9] and 42 months [95%CI 32.5–51.4], respectively. The OS of 1 year, 2 year, 3 year and 5 year was 78.8%, 64.4%, 53.8% and 38.9%, respectively. On univariate analysis, favorable factors for OS included tumor size ≤ 5 cm, low-grade histology, tumors of renal vascular origin and non-metastatic disease at presentation. Neoadjuvant or adjuvant treatment with either radiotherapy or chemotherapy has been shown to improve OS (NR vs. 36 months, p < 0.001), especially for high-grade tumors > 5 cm in size. Conclusion Radical nephrectomy with en bloc tumor resection with negative margins forms the mainstay of treatment for renal leiomyosarcomas. Adjuvant radiotherapy or chemotherapy appears to improve OS. To validate this treatment strategy, prospective multicentric efforts are required to acquire reliable data from randomized trials.
Neuroendocrine tumor of the liver in pregnancy: A very rare case report Ramya Lasmi, Ramandeep Bansal, Vanita Suri, Chandan Krushna Das, Reetu Kundu International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2024 Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) of the liver represent a rare entity. Amongst this group of uncommon diseases primary hepatic neuroendocrine neoplasm (PH‐NEN) represent only 0.3% of all NENs. Moreover, PH‐NEN has very rarely been reported in pregnancy. We report a 28‐year‐old young patient with metastatic small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the liver complicated with pregnancy. She was evaluated and managed through a multidisciplinary team approach and received two cycles of chemotherapy with a cisplatin/etoposide regimen during the antenatal period and delivered at 37 weeks period of gestation (POG). This case highlights the importance of major challenges faced during the diagnosis and management of this very rare disease in pregnancy and the successful fetomaternal outcome.
Efficacy and Safety of Biosimilar Cetuximab Versus Innovator Cetuximab in Indian Patients With Head and Neck Cancer: A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase III Trial Kumar Prabhash, Chetan Deshmukh, Hemant Malhotra, Atul Sharma, Minish Jain, Nilesh Dhamne, Rajnish Nagarakar, Prasantha Ganesan, Vijay K. Mahobia, Chandan K. Das, Rejnish Kumar, Prakash S. Shivanna, Manu P. Avaronnan, Puligundla K. Chaithanya, Vaibhav Chaudhary, Kartar Singh, Suhas Aagre, Bellala Ravishankar, Dhruv Mehta, Kandipalli Shilpa, Vashishth Maniar, Koushik Chatterjee, Saroj D. Majumdar, Rohitashwa Dana, Vanita Noronha, Nandini Menon, Akhilesh Sharma, Roshan Pawar, Vinayaka Shahavi, Rajiv Yadav, Amol Aiwale JCO Global Oncology, 2024 PURPOSE Squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) is the sixth most common cancer, with approximately 225,419 new cases with over 125,000 deaths annually in India. This trial compared the efficacy and safety of biosimilar cetuximab versus innovator cetuximab (IC) in combination with platinum-based chemotherapy in patients with recurrent locoregional or metastatic SCCHN. METHODS This phase III trial is a multicenter, randomized, double-blind and parallel group study performed in Indian patients with recurrent locoregional or metastatic SCCHN. Patients were randomly assigned in 2:1 ratio to receive biosimilar cetuximab and IC in combination with cisplatin and fluorouracil via intravenous infusions. The primary end points were disease control rate (DCR) and overall response rate (ORR) as per response evaluation criteria in solid tumors version 1.1. The secondary end points included pharmacokinetics (PK), immunogenicity, safety, and tolerability. RESULTS Of 180 patients enrolled, 120 patients received biosimilar cetuximab and 60 patients received IC treatment. No significant statistical difference was observed in the primary outcomes between two groups. Treatment difference in DCR and ORR response was found to be –5.21 (90% CI, –8.94 to –1.48) and –4.79 (90% CI, –19.42 to 9.84), respectively, indicating noninferiority to reference product. The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs; biosimilar cetuximab: 89.2% v IC: 91.7%; P = .8364) and serious AEs (biosimilar cetuximab: 23.3% v IC: 13.3%; P = .0603) and PK parameters were comparable between treatment groups. The immunogenicity findings showed higher incidence of anticetuximab antibodies in the biosimilar cetuximab group compared with the IC group at the end of Study. CONCLUSION The findings of this study demonstrated noninferiority along with comparable PK, safety, and immunogenicity of biosimilar cetuximab and IC in patients with recurrent or metastatic SCCHN.
Contrast Enhanced CT Versus MRI for Accurate Diagnosis of Wall-thickening Type Gallbladder Cancer Daneshwari Kalage, Pankaj Gupta, Ajay Gulati, Kakivaya P. Reddy, Kritika Sharma, Ati Thakur, Thakur D. Yadav, Vikas Gupta, Lileswar Kaman, Ritambhra Nada, Harjeet Singh, Santosh Irrinki, Parikshaa Gupta, Chandan K. Das, Usha Dutta, Manavjit Sandhu Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hepatology, 2024
Breast cancer treatment during the COVID-19 pandemic Atul Batra, Prashant Mehta, Amol Patel, Sainath Bhethanabhotla, Bivas Biswas, Raja Pramanik, Chandan Krushna Das Indian Journal of Medical and Paediatric Oncology, 2021
How i treat epithelial ovarian cancer during COVID-19 pandemic Chandan Krushna Das, Shubh Mahindru, Amol Patel, Atul Batra, Bivas Biswas, Prashant Mehta, Raja Pramanik, Sainath Bhethanabhotla, Vineet Govinda Gupta Indian Journal of Medical and Paediatric Oncology, 2021
Colorectal cancer chemotherapy during COVID-19 pandemic Sainath Bhethanabhotla, Raja Pramanik, Priyanka Srivastava, Prashant Mehta, Amol Patel, Bivas Biswas, Atul Batra, Vineet Govinda Gupta, Chandan Das, Shubh Mahindru Indian Journal of Medical and Paediatric Oncology, 2021
How we treat lung cancer during SARS-Cov-2 (COVID-19) pandemic in India? Bivas Biswas, Sandip Ganguly, Deepak Dabkara, Joydeep Ghosh, Priyanka Srivastava, Prashant Mehta, Amol Patel, Sainath Bhethanabhotla, Atul Batra, Raja Pramanik, Vineet Govinda Gupta, Chandan Krushna Das, Shubh Mahindru Indian Journal of Medical and Paediatric Oncology, 2021
Reply to d. o'reilly et al Amol Patel, Vineet Govinda Gupta, Bivas Biswas, Sandip Ganguly, Chandan K. Das, Atul Batra, Sainath Bhethanabhotla JCO Global Oncology, 2021
Computed tomography texture-based radiomics analysis in gallbladder cancer: initial experience Pankaj Gupta, Pratyaksha Rana, Balaji Ganeshan, Daneshwari Kalage, Santosh Irrinki, Vikas Gupta, Thakur Deen Yadav, Rajender Kumar, Chandan K. Das, Parikshaa Gupta, Raymond Endozo, Ritambhra Nada, Radhika Srinivasan, Naveen Kalra, Usha Dutta, Manavjit Sandhu Clinical and Experimental Hepatology, 2021
Advisory for cancer patients during the COVIDpandemic Priyanka Srivastava, TV. S. V. G. K. Tilak, Amol Patel, ChandanK Das, Bivas Biswas, Shubh Mahindru, Raja Pramanik, Joydeep Ghosh, Prashant Mehta Cancer Research Statistics and Treatment, 2020
Oncotype DX: Where does it stand in India? Atul Batra, Amol Patel, Vineet Govinda Gupta, Prashant Mehta, Tilak TVSVGK, Bivas Biswas, Raja Pramanik, Chandan Krishnan Das, Priyanka Srivastava Journal of Global Oncology, 2019