Leila Namdarian

@en.irandoc.ac.ir

Associate Professor in science and technology policymaking, Information and Society Research Department, Iranian Research Institute for Information Science and Technology (IRANDOC), Tehran, Iran
Iranian research institute for information science and technology (IranDoc)

Leila Namdarian


                  Download Compact PDF  
https://researchid.co/leilanamdarian
Leila Namdarian has a PhD in science and technology policy, graduated in 2014 from Tarbiat Modares University. She got her MSc degree in information technology management from the same university in 2010 and her BSc degree in industrial management from Valiasr Rafsanjan University in 2008. She began her scientific experience in 2015 as a faculty member in she is an associate professor of Information Policy Research Group. Her efforts has mainly devoted to science and technology policy and foresight. Her research interests include scientometrics, science audit, science and technology policy, strategic planning, national innovation system, strategic information system, IT governance, Knowledge management.

RESEARCH, TEACHING, or OTHER INTERESTS

Management of Technology and Innovation, Management Information Systems, Education, Strategy and Management
19

Scopus Publications

238

Scholar Citations

9

Scholar h-index

9

Scholar i10-index

Scopus Publications

  • Towards AI-enabled evidence-based policymaking in science and technology: a conceptual framework
    Leila Namdarian
    Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 2026
  • Evaluation Indicators of Science, Technology, and Innovation: A Comparative Study of Iran, Australia, and New Zealand
    Leila Namdarian
    Scientometrics Research Journal, 2025
    purpose: In today’s rapidly evolving global landscape, effectivly evaluating and monitoring research and technology capabilities is crucial for fostering innovation, economic growth, and competitiveness. This study aims to comprehensively analyze and compare of science, technology, and innovation (STI) evaluation indicators across three distinct national contexts: Iran, Australia, and New Zealand. By developing a robust thematic framework, the research provides actionable insights and recommendations for policymakers seeking to strengthen their research and innovation ecosystems. Aligning evaluation methods with global standards is of paramount importance, particularly as nations increasingly compete in the global knowledge economy. Australia and New Zealand were selected as benchmarks due to their leadership in STI evaluation practices. This choice enables a nuanced understanding of how different national contexts shape STI policies and outcomes. Through this comparative approach, the study highlights best practices and contextual adaptations that can inform global policymaking.Methodology: This study employs a systematic and qualitative methodology to compare science, technology, and innovation (STI) evaluation indicators in Iran, Australia, and New Zealand. Data collection involved library research, document reviews, and analysis of governmental and institutional reports. A total of 445 indicators were identified and categorized into six thematic groups: (1) scientific publications, (2) human capital, (3) technology, (4) budget, (5) institutional environment, and (6) innovation. These categories include various subcategories, such as R&D expenditure, education funding, venture capital investment, patents, and technology transfer, offering a multidimensional perspective on STI evaluation. A thematic analysis was conducted to identify patterns, strengths, and weaknesses within each national system, ensuring a robust comparative framework. By intergrating on both qualitative and quantitative metrics, this methodology highlights the importance of aligning evaluation systems with global best practices while considering local contexts. Furthermore, the study adopts an interdisciplinary approach, incorporating insights from science policy, economics, and innovation studies to enrich the comparative analysis.Findings: The findings reveal significant differences in the prioritization and implementation of STI evaluation indicators across the three countries. In Iran, the focus is primarily on scientific productivity and human capital development, emphasizing national research outputs and workforce expansion. In contrast, Australia and New Zealand prioritize technology commercialization, venture capital investment, and international collaborations, reflecting their advanced innovation ecosystems and integration into the global markets. The indicators were systematically classified into six overarching categories, with subcategories providing insights into R&D funding, innovative business environments, and knowledge transfer mechanisms. For example, the technology category includes measures such as patents, industrial designs, and trademarks, while the human capital category examines metrics related to researchers, students, and workforce development. Through thematic analysis, this study identifies both shared practices and unique strategies in the STI evaluation frameworks of each country. Iran's Science, Technology, and Innovation (STI) evaluation framework demonstrates notable strengths in fostering national research initiatives; however, it faces challenges in integrating these efforts with broader innovation policies. In contrast, the systems of Australia and New Zealand employ a balanced approach, intergrating quantitative metrics with qualitative assessments to comprehensively capture STI activities. The differences among the three countries underscore the influence of governance models, funding structures, and regional priorities on shaping STI evaluation outcomes. This analysis highlights the role of contextual factors—such as economic priorities, governance frameworks, and cultural norms— in shaping the design and effectiveness of STI evaluation systems.Conclusion: This study contributes a significantly to the field of STI evaluation by providing a comprehensive comparative analysis of three distinct national contexts. The findings highligh the importance of aligning evaluation frameworks with international standards while also adapting them to local needs and priorities. For policymakers, the study offers a roadmap to foster dynamic innovation ecosystems, optimize resource allocation, and enhance global competitiveness. It also underscores the need for flexible evaluation systems capable of adapting to emerging technologies, shifting priorities, and new trends. Furthermore, the research identifies gaps in existing systems and proposes targeted strategies to improve the efficiency and impact of STI initiatives across diverse contexts. The thematic framework developed in the study serves as a valuable tool for other countries seeking to assess and strengthen their Science, Technology, and Innovation (STI) evaluation systems. It emphasizes the importance of balancing quantitative indicators, such as publication outputs and patents, and qualitative measures, such as collaboration quality. Ultimately, accurately assessing and strategically enhancing STI capabilities is critical for maintaining a competitive edge in the global knowledge economy. This research offers practical insights for nations seeking to align innovation policies with global standards while promoting sustainable development and long-term economic resilience. By providing a dynamic and adaptable evaluation framework, this study not only advances academic discourse in science, technology, and innovation (STI) evaluation but also offers practical guidance for practitioners and policymakers around the globe. The findings highlight the importance of robust evaluation systems in driving innovation and ensuring that research efforts translate into meaningful societal and economic outcomes. They also underscore the potential to scale successful practices across different regions while addressing context-specific challenges. As global challenges continue to evolve, this study emphasizes the necessity for continuous refinement and innovation in Science, Technology, and Innovation (STI) evaluation practices to meet the demands of an increasingly interconnected world.
  • An institutional approach to analyze the multi-level policymaking system of online social networks: a case study of Iran
    Leila Namdarian, Hamid Reza Khedmatgozar
    Digital Policy Regulation and Governance, 2024
    Purpose This study aims to elucidate institutional analysis as an effective approach to investigating and designing the multilevel policymaking system of online social networks (OSN) for achieving a participatory model. Design/methodology/approach The institutional mapping approach has been used to analyze Iran’s OSN multilevel policymaking system. A combination of two matrices, including institutions-institutions and institutions-functions, was used to perform the institutional mapping. Two main steps were taken to draw the mentioned matrices. First, a review of related studies in Iran’s OSN policymaking system was conducted and the policy functions mentioned in these studies were identified and categorized using the meta-synthesis. Second, based on analyzing two policy documents of Iran’s OSN, institutions and their interactions were identified and policy functions were allocated to institutions. Findings Based on the results, the most important policy functions in the current OSN policymaking system in Iran are support, regulatory, monitoring and evaluation, business environment development, culture building and promotion, organizing licenses and permissions, policymaking and legislation. Also, the results show that there are shortcomings in this system, some of the most important of which are lack of transparency in regulatory, little work in culture building and promotion, neglect of the training of specialized human resources and research and development, slow development of the business environment and neglecting the role of nongovernmental organizations in policymaking. Originality/value By examining and analyzing how different institutions operate within a multilevel policymaking system, the policymaking process and its overall effectiveness can be enhanced. This analysis helps identify any inconsistencies, overlaps or conflicts in the roles and policies of these institutions, leading to a better understanding of how a multilevel policymaking system is organized.
  • How Does the Evidence-Based Approach Contribute to Ethical Policy-Making in Science and Technology?
    Leila Namdarian, Hamid Reza Khedmatgozar
    Iranian Journal of Information Processing and Management, 2024
    Evidence-based policy-making is an ongoing process of gathering legal and ethical information, analyzing it intelligently, and disseminating intelligence at the operational level in a controlled manner to policymakers. This approach makes the policymakers have a proactive approach to the consequences of science and technology (S&T) and formulate ethical policies to achieve desirable economic and social results in the field of S&T. The purpose of this research is to describe how the evidence-based approach contributes to ethical policy-making in S&T. To achieve this goal while explaining the evidence-based policy-making approach, the concept of strategic intelligence in policy-making has been used to explain the theoretical foundations of the research. Then, the ethical components of evidence-based policy-making are identified from related resources and documents using the documentary study. To classify the ethical components of evidence-based policy-making, identify the relationships between them, and formulate the framework of evidence-based ethical policy-making, a thematic analysis method inspired by the 7-step approach of Noblit and Hare (1988) has been used. Based on the results of this research, the steps of evidence-based ethical policy-making are the Identification of information sources, Analytical tools of strategic intelligence in policy-making, Policy intelligence, and ethical policy formulation. Also, in all these steps, policymakers must follow the principles of politics that have an ethical aspect, including participation, objectivity, methodicality, and learning.
  • Designing an Expert System for Information Technology Sourcing Decision Making (Case Study: Iranian Research Institute for Information Science and Technology (IranDoc))
    Hamid Reza Khedmatgozar, Leila Namdarian
    Iranian Journal of Information Processing and Management, 2023
    One of the questions that institutions in the field of information technology are facing is how to get the services, products, equipment and materials they need? Relying on internal capabilities and resources (insourcing) or benefiting from external capabilities and resources (outsourcing) are the two main methods of acquiring services, products, equipment and materials needed by a business to achieve its goals. It is generally referred to as sourcing. Lack of financial resources and provision of expert human resources is one of the main issues of institutions in sourcing information technology systems, services and equipment, which has caused institutions to look for a pre-reliable and systematic procedure to choose between sourcing methods in response to this question. Based on this issue, this research aims to design an expert system for information technology sourcing decisions and apply it to the study of the Iranian Research Institute for Information Science and Technology (IranDoc) as a case. In order to achieve this goal, in the first step, 1- identifying the factors affecting the sourcing of information technology systems, services and equipment, and 2- designing an expert system for making information technology sourcing decisions. In this step, by using collection tools including library study and nominal group with experts and decision makers in the field of information technology in order to make a sourcing decision between the two options of external sourcing (outsourcing) and internal sourcing (insourcing), the legal and decision making framework in the form of a expert system was designed and presented with tacit knowledge extraction, inference engine, comparison and prioritization structure, legal structure and execution process components. In the second step, in order to show the validity, the design and implementation of the prototype was considered as one of the validation methods. In this step, after designing the prototype, the decision-making process for 10 potential activities (projects) of IranDoc Information Technology Center was used. The results showed that the designed expert system meets the objectives of the research. The results of this research as a whole can provide a structured model for using the benefits of various sourcing mechanisms and reducing financial risks and providing human resources to the policy makers and managers and improve the current situation.
  • Who or what really counts? The application of BASEClass for stakeholder evaluation and classification
    Hamid Reza Khedmatgozar, Leila Namdarian, Behrooz Rasuli
    Management Decision, 2023
    PurposeThe purpose of this study is to develop a framework for categorizing and evaluating stakeholders that addresses the key five constraints of The Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience (TSIS), including (1) binary attributes, (2) heterogeneous stakeholders in each category, (3) ignoring stakeholder-organization relationship, (4) ignoring stakeholders' communication frequency and (5) ignoring fringe stakeholders.Design/methodology/approachIn the first step, a set of solutions for the limitations and constraints of TSIS was extracted by holding three rounds of the Delphi method with the participation of 42 senior and middle Iranian managers in various organizations and based on it, “Basic Analysis for Stakeholder Evaluation and Classification” (BASEClass) was developed as an enhanced theoretical and empirical framework for stakeholder analysis. In the second Step BASEClass is validated by conducting an empirical study in an organization with the participation of 46 managers, experts and specialists.FindingsBASEClass is an enhanced theoretical and methodological framework for classifying stakeholders based on the three primary attributes of legitimacy, power and urgency, and also the communication quantity as a complementary attribute in a 3D cubical schema, prioritizing stakeholders in several cubes based on one of the multi-criteria group decision-making methods.Originality/valueBASEClass effectively reduces the mentioned limitations and constraints of TSIS and as a result can improve the effectiveness of strategies for dealing with different stakeholders.
  • Ethics in Science and Technology Policy-Making: A Proposed Normative Framework
    Leila Namdarian, Rahman Sharifzadeh, Hamid Reza Khedmatgozar
    Bulletin of Science Technology and Society, 2022
    In the twenty-first century, the focus of science and technology (S&T) on the human interests and the accessible interests of society, and so the rise of some questions concerning the impact of S&T on social norms, has led to embedding ethical debates in S&T policy-making. The ethics of S&T policy-making, as a representation of the relationship between ethics and S&T policy-making, is a relatively new area of applied and professional ethics that addresses the dilemmas and ethical challenges of the S&T policy-making process. Understanding and recognizing the ethical components of S&T policy-making, one can develop a normative framework to assist policymakers in designing and analyzing ethical policies in the S&T field. The design and development of such a framework is the main purpose of the present study. In this study, the components of the proposed framework for ethical policy-making in S&T, their ethical and policy approaches, as well as their fundamental ethical and policy principles have been identified through studying sources and texts related to meta-ethics, normative ethics, and S&T ethics. Then, these components have been categorized in the form of steps for ethical policy-making using the thematic analysis method. Based on the results of this study, the ethical policy-making steps in S&T include problem identification, information gathering and feeding of the policy process, policy advice and policy formulation, policy implementation, and policy evaluation, which follow 9 ethical principles and 13 policy principles.
  • Developing solutions for open access to the full text of theses/ dissertations of educational and research institutes in Iran
    Iranian Journal of Information Processing and Management, 2021
  • Developing a comprehensive framework for analyzing national scientific and technical information policy: application of HeLICAM in Iran
    Leila Namdarian, Sirous Alidousti, Behrooz Rasuli
    Online Information Review, 2021
    PurposeStrengthening and improving Scientific and Technical Information (S&Ti) flow in all nations require an effective national S&Ti policy (NS&TiP). The very first step in developing an integrated NS&TiP is clarifying its scope and dimensions. Therefore, this study aimed to identify the dimensions of NS&TiP, in the form of an analytical framework, and to show how to apply it.Design/methodology/approachThe current study adopted a qualitative method, called the framework approach, and proposed HeLICAM, a comprehensive framework including different dimensions for NS&TiP. Afterward, Iran's science and technology documents were analyzed based on the proposed framework.FindingsHeLICAM framework includes (1) human resources, (2) laws and regulations, (3) ICT infrastructure, (4) connections, (5) activities and (6) information market. The results obtained from the application of HeLICAM in the analysis of Iran's science and technology policy documents indicated that the various dimensions of NS&TiP have mostly been overlooked. Although several policies have been developed for science and technology in Iran, the efforts have not been comprehensive and effective enough.Originality/valueThis study proposes the normative analytical framework called HeLICAM. The purpose of HeLICAM is to provide a draft of NS&TiP dimensions to policymakers that will be useful in NS&Ti policymaking because this framework helps to answer questions like “what dimensions have been considered in writing the policy document?” and “What it lacks?”, “What are its strengths and weaknesses?”, and “How can it be improved?”Peer reviewThe peer review history for this article is available at:https://publons.com/publon/10.1108/OIR-11-2020-0493
  • A new Conceptual Architecture for Knowledge Management in Enterprise 2.0 based on Open Innovation
    Iranian Journal of Information Processing and Management, 2020
  • Towards an understanding of the commercialization drivers of research findings in Iran
    Leila Namdarian, Ali Naimi-Sadigh
    African Journal of Science Technology Innovation and Development, 2018
  • Designing and developing a website for information recourses related to monitoring and evaluation indicators of science, technology and innovation (STI)
    Iranian Journal of Information Processing Management, 2018
  • Providing a model for strengthening the economic impacts of the National Information Network
    Iranian Journal of Information Processing Management, 2017
  • Evidence-based policy-making and the role of statistics and information
    Iranian Journal of Information Processing Management, 2016
  • Developing a model to evaluate the impacts of science, technology and innovation foresight on policy-making
    Alireza Hassanzadeh, Leila Namdarian, Mehdi Majidpour, Sha'ban Elahi
    Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 2015
  • Impact of Technology Foresight on the Policy-making Process in Iran
    Alireza Hassanzadeh, Leila Namdarian, Sha’Ban Elahi, Mehdi Majidpour
    Science Technology and Society, 2014
  • A model for service oriented architecture (SOA) governance maturity
    Iranian Journal of Information Processing Management, 2012
  • Developing a framework for evaluating service oriented architecture governance (SOAG)
    Alireza Hassanzadeh, Leila Namdarian, Sha’ban Elahi
    Knowledge Based Systems, 2011
  • Developing a framework for service oriented architecture governance maturity (SOAGM)
    Alireza Hassanzadeh, Leila Namdarian
    2010 5th International Symposium on Telecommunications Ist 2010, 2010

RECENT SCHOLAR PUBLICATIONS

  • Developing an Ethical Framework for Science and Technology Policymaking and Applying It to the Analysis of Iran’s Comprehensive Scientific Map
    L Namdarian, HR Khedmatgozar
    Iranian Journal of Public Policy 12 (1), 154-174 , 2026
    2026
  • A Three-Level Comparative Study of Scientific Associations in Australia and New Zealand: Lessons for the Development of Scientific Associations in Iran
    L Namdarian, HR Khedmatgozar
    Popularization of Science 16 (2), e234849 , 2025
    2025
  • Comparative Evaluation of Business Continuity Management Frameworks Case Study: Iran Research Institute of Information Science and Technology (Irandoc).
    HR Khedmatgozar, E Shayesteh, H Hassani, L Namdarian
    Sciences & Techniques of Information Management 11 (3) , 2025
    2025
  • The Functions of Natural Language Processing in Evidence-based Policy Making
    L Namdarian
    Iranian Journal of Public Policy 11 (2), 81-100 , 2025
    2025
    Citations: 1
  • Towards AI-enabled evidence-based policymaking in science and technology: a conceptual framework
    L Namdarian
    Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 1-16 , 2025
    2025
    Citations: 1
  • Evaluation Indicators of Science, Technology, and Innovation: A Comparative Study of Iran, Australia, and New Zealand
    L Namdarian
    Scientometrics Research Journal 11 (1), 49-74 , 2025
    2025
  • Analyzing the Governance System of Audio and Video Media Services in Iran Based on Institutional Mapping of Upstream Documents
    L Namdarian, HR Khedmatgozar
    Quarterly Journal of The Macro and Strategic Policies 12 (48), 963-1002 , 2024
    2024
  • An institutional approach to analyze the multi-level policymaking system of online social networks: a case study of Iran
    L Namdarian, HR Khedmatgozar
    Digital Policy, Regulation and Governance 26 (3), 267-294 , 2024
    2024
  • Strategies for Removing the Obstacles to Childbearing for Female Faculty Members in Iran The Application of the Future-Oriented Approach of Casual Layer Analysis
    L Namdarian
    Iranian Journal of Public Policy 9 (4), 24-46 , 2024
    2024
    Citations: 1
  • How does the evidence-based approach contribute to ethical policy making in science and technology?
    L Namdarian, HR Khedmatgozar
    پژوهشنامه پردازش و مدیریت اطلاعات 39 (ویژه نامه انگلیسی 2), 1-26 , 2024 ‎
    2024
    Citations: 2
  • Investigating the Role of Data Mining in Enhancing Science and Technology Policymaking: Analyzing Functions and Implications
    L Namdarian, HR Khedamatgozar
    Quarterly Journal of Governance Knowledge 2 (4), 4-29 , 2024
    2024
  • Analyzing the Entrepreneurship of Women Faculty Members in Iran: Barriers, Drivers, and Strategies
    L Namdarian, HR Khedamatgozar
    Women's Studies 15 (49), 1-24 , 2024
    2024
  • Designing an Expert System for Information Technology Sourcing Decision Making (Case study: Iranian Research Institute for Information Science and Technology (IranDoc))
    HR Khedmatgozar, L Namdarian
    Iranian Journal of Information Processing and Management 39 (1), 201-240 , 2023
    2023
  • Who or what really counts? The application of BASEClass for stakeholder evaluation and classification
    HR Khedmatgozar, L Namdarian, B Rasuli
    Management decision 61 (7), 1966-1997 , 2023
    2023
    Citations: 6
  • Policy Suggestions for the Science and Technology Sector in the Seventh Five-Year Plan for Economic, Social, and Cultural Development based on the National-Level Policy Documents
    L Namdarian, S Alidosti
    quarterly journal of macro and strategic policies 11 (42), 240-271 , 2023
    2023
  • Identification of policy functions in Iran's cyberspace content governance system
    L Namdarian, HR Khedmatgozar
    The 9 international conference on web research , 2023
    2023
  • Ethics in science and technology policy-making: A proposed normative framework
    L Namdarian, R Sharifzadeh, HR Khedmatgozar
    Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society 42 (4), 117-132 , 2022
    2022
    Citations: 5
  • National Information Policy: Framework, Dimensions, and Components
    L Namdarian, B Rasuli
    Journal of Studies in Library and Information Science 14 (1), 63-91 , 2022
    2022
    Citations: 2
  • Ethics in Science and Technology Policy-Making: A Proposed Normative Framework
    HR Khedmatgozar, R Sharifzadeh, L Namdarian
    2022
  • Technical and Legal Considerations of Using Social Networks in Iranian Public Libraries
    H Khedmatgozar, L Namdarian, S Monsefi
    2022

MOST CITED SCHOLAR PUBLICATIONS

  • Developing a framework for evaluating service oriented architecture governance (SOAG)
    A Hassanzadeh, L Namdarian, S Elahi
    Knowledge-Based Systems 24 (5), 716-730 , 2011
    2011
    Citations: 30
  • The Impact of Knowledge Management on Organizational Performance: A Structural Equation Modeling Study
    L Namdarian, S Arman, S Bahanesteh
    AD-minster 37 (12), 85-108 , 2020
    2020
    Citations: 22
  • The Supportive Policies for New Technology-Based Firms (NTBF's)
    R Naghizadeh, L Namdarian
    Science and Technology policy 11 (2), 285-296 , 2019
    2019
    Citations: 19
  • Barriers to commercialization of research findings in humanities in Iran
    L Namdarian, A Naimi-Sadigh
    Interdisciplinary Journal of Management Studies 11 (3), 487-518 , 2018
    2018
    Citations: 19
  • Towards an understanding of the commercialization drivers of research findings in Iran
    L Namdarian, A Naimi-Sadigh
    African Journal of Science, Technology, Innovation and Development 10 (4 … , 2018
    2018
    Citations: 18
  • Developing a model to evaluate the impacts of science, technology and innovation foresight on policy-making
    A Hassanzadeh, L Namdarian, M Majidpour, S Elahi
    Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 27 (4), 437-460 , 2015
    2015
    Citations: 14
  • Impact of technology foresight on the policy-making process in Iran
    A Hassanzadeh, L Namdarian, SB Elahi, M Majidpour
    Science, Technology and Society 19 (3), 275-304 , 2014
    2014
    Citations: 14
  • Identifying barriers to science and technology policy implementation in Iran
    M Majidpour, L Namdarian
    Innovation Management Journal 4 (4), 31-60 , 2016
    2016
    Citations: 11
  • Evidence-based Policy-making and the Role of Statistics and Information
    L Namdarian
    Iranian journal of information processing and management 31 (3), 601-629 , 2015
    2015
    Citations: 11
  • Developing a framework for service oriented architecture governance maturity (soagm)
    A Hassanzadeh, L Namdarian
    2010 5th International Symposium on Telecommunications, 513-520 , 2010
    2010
    Citations: 8
  • Evaluation of science, technology, and innovation (STI) in Iran
    L Namdarian
    COLLNET Journal of Scientometrics and Information Management 11 (2), 253-271 , 2017
    2017
    Citations: 7
  • Who or what really counts? The application of BASEClass for stakeholder evaluation and classification
    HR Khedmatgozar, L Namdarian, B Rasuli
    Management decision 61 (7), 1966-1997 , 2023
    2023
    Citations: 6
  • Ethics in science and technology policy-making: A proposed normative framework
    L Namdarian, R Sharifzadeh, HR Khedmatgozar
    Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society 42 (4), 117-132 , 2022
    2022
    Citations: 5
  • Evaluating the impacts of foresight on Science, Technology and Innovation (STI) policy-making
    L Namdarian, A Hassanzadeh, M Majidpour
    Innovation Management Journal 3 (2), 703-102 , 2014
    2014
    Citations: 5
  • The impact of knowledge management on organizational performance: a structural equation modeling study. AD-minister 37: 85–108
    L Namdarian, A Sajedinejad, S Bahanesteh
    2020
    Citations: 4
  • Analyzing appropriate features of data for using in policy-making
    L Namdarian
    Political Quarterly 49 (2), 515-534 , 2019
    2019
    Citations: 4
  • Investigating and explaining the applicability of research results in policy making: a bridge between Theory and practice
    L Namdarian
    Quarterly Political Public 2 (3), 101-117 , 2016
    2016
    Citations: 4
  • Developing a comprehensive framework for analyzing national scientific and technical information policy: application of HeLICAM in Iran
    L Namdarian, S Alidousti, B Rasuli
    Online Information Review 45 (7), 1381-1403 , 2021
    2021
    Citations: 3
  • How does the evidence-based approach contribute to ethical policy making in science and technology?
    L Namdarian, HR Khedmatgozar
    پژوهشنامه پردازش و مدیریت اطلاعات 39 (ویژه نامه انگلیسی 2), 1-26 , 2024 ‎
    2024
    Citations: 2
  • National Information Policy: Framework, Dimensions, and Components
    L Namdarian, B Rasuli
    Journal of Studies in Library and Information Science 14 (1), 63-91 , 2022
    2022
    Citations: 2